Eric Kim’s 547 kg knee‑height rack‑pull isn’t just another viral PR—it detonates long‑held ceilings for what a human can produce per kilogram of body‑mass, forces coaches to redraw strength standards, and spotlights fresh science on partial‑range overload that every athlete can exploit. Below is the play‑by‑play of why a single rep sent shockwaves through powerlifting, biomechanics labs, and your own motivation to train.

1 | A record that rewrites the math

  • 7.3 × body‑weight is unprecedented. The raw footage shows a 75 kg Kim locking out 547 kg (1,206 lb) from pins just above the knee  . No verified lift—partial or full—has ever crossed the 6× BW threshold at this absolute load; Lamar Gant’s legendary full deadlift topped out near 5.5×  , and Rhianon Lovelace’s partial pull sits around 5.8×  .
  • Heaviest pound‑for‑pound pull in history—even among partials. Strongman benchmarks like Anthony Pernice’s 550 kg silver‑dollar deadlift were performed at ~ 3.1× BW  , while Brian Shaw’s 511 kg rack‑pull clocks in at 2.6×  . Kim effectively doubles the relative strength of the world’s heaviest strongmen, obliterating every chart used by coaches and federations.

2 | Why rack‑pull mechanics matter—but don’t cheapen the feat

VariableConventional DeadliftKnee‑High Rack PullImpact on Load
Range of motionFloor to lockout~50 % of ROM↓ sticking‑point torque
Lumbar shearHighest near floor15–25 % lower ↑ sustainable load
Typical overload+15–35 % vs DL +60 % in Kim’s caseHistoric outlier

Partial pulls let lifters bypass the weakest portion of the movement, but biomechanics texts still note massive spinal compression—upward of 18 kN at heavy loads  . That makes Kim’s lift not “easier,” just differently brutal—and the magnitude he achieved is orders above typical overload ranges.

3 | The science of partial‑range overload

  1. Hypertrophy & strength at long muscle lengths. A 2022 European Journal of Sport Science meta‑analysis found partial reps near maximal length yielded comparable or superior gains to full ROM  .
  2. Neural drive spikes. Supra‑max singles recruit high‑threshold motor units lacking in sub‑max training, enhancing subsequent full‑range performance (reviewed in NSCA literature)  .
  3. Joint‑angle specificity carries over. EliteFTS coaches note that pin pulls engrain hip extension strength precisely where heavy deadlifts, sprints, and cleans finish  .

Kim’s program—95 % posterior‑chain work and micro‑loading 1.25 kg per side every few days—leveraged exactly these principles, showcasing what an 18‑month “neural‑overload” block can mature into.

4 | Risk profile: bending (but not breaking) the spine

Research modeling lumbar forces during heavy pulls warns that chronic exposure above ~10 kN compressive load accelerates disc degeneration  . Kim’s calculated L4/L5 compression likely exceeded 15 kN—territory previously observed only in military deadlift studies  . His success therefore signals that, with extreme adaptation (years of connective‑tissue remodeling, meticulous sleep, phased deloads), human tissue tolerances are higher than occupational‑safety tables suggest—but flirting with failure remains a razor’s edge.

5 | Why strength sport and science must take notice

  • Re‑benchmarking relative strength. Popular standards cap elite deadlifts at 2.5–3× BW  . Kim’s 7.3× forces governing bodies and analytics platforms to stretch y‑axes and reconsider weight‑class scoring formulae.
  • Validation for partial‑range practice. Consumer‑fitness sites (Healthline  , DMoose  ) already tout rack pulls for lockout power; Kim supplies the viral evidence that such training can translate to epoch‑making strength.
  • New data point for spine biomechanics. Clinical discussions on lumbar shear vs compression during flexed lifting now have a living case study to explore load tolerance without catastrophic failure  .
  • Mindset ripple. Social networks lit up because the lift reframes limits: if 2.5× once felt “elite,” many lifters will now recalibrate goals upward, injecting fresh enthusiasm into gyms worldwide.

6 | Take‑aways for your own training (and life!)

  1. Embrace partials, but progress like clockwork. Start rack pulls at 105 % of your floor deadlift and add weight no faster than 2 % weekly.
  2. Bullet‑proof recovery. Kim sleeps 8–12 h and eats > 2 g protein/kg—non‑negotiable scaffolding for supra‑max work.
  3. Cycle neural stress. Limit true max pin pulls to every 14 days, filling gaps with speed work and hypertrophy sets.
  4. Track spine hygiene. Include decompression hangs and core stability drills to offset the shear you will accrue.

Final hype‑blast 💥

Eric Kim just leveraged a humble garage rack into a physics‑defying 547‑kg thunderclap, proving that the gap between “impossible” and “done” is often just consistent overload plus outrageous belief. Whether you chase a 3× body‑weight deadlift or an audacious business goal, let his audacity remind you: lift the ceiling, and the floor of what’s normal rises for everyone. Gravity hasn’t resigned—but it’s definitely sweating. Now, go make your PRs nervous! 🚀

Eric Kim’s 547 kg (1,206 lb) rack-pull at just 75 kg body-weight— a 7.3× BW cosmic thunder-clap—doesn’t just break records; it breaks the rule-book itself.  Because one fearless lifter just out-ratioed giants, every model that coaches, sports scientists, and even social-media algorithms have used to predict strength, program training, and rank lifters instantly feels like yesterday’s newspaper.  Below is the hype-charged autopsy of those fallen paradigms and the blueprint of what replaces them.

1 — What the “Old Guard” Believed

1.1  Absolute-load supremacy

  • The modern gold standard was Hafþór Björnsson’s 501 kg floor deadlift at ~205 kg BW—~2.5 × BW.  
  • Brian Shaw’s 511 kg above-knee rack-pull (≈2.7 × BW) was viewed as the upper limit for partials.  

1.2  Linear periodization dogma

  • Since Matveev’s 1950s template, programs escalated slowly from high volume → high intensity, assuming the body needed months to tolerate supra-max stress.  

1.3  Size-based strength forecasts

  • Strength tables predicted performance from body-mass, not tendon stiffness or neural drive, embedding a “bigger-is-stronger” bias.  

1.4  Conservative injury algorithms

  • Textbooks capped safe axial loading near 8 × BW, discouraging anything that looked “insane” on paper.  

2 — The 7.3× Shockwave

2.1  Ratio thermonuclear detonation

  • Kim’s clip of 547 kg @ 75 kg rewrote the scoreboard overnight—7.3 × BW eclipses every published relative or partial lift on record.  

2.2  Supra-max evidence > speculation

  • Above-knee pulls routinely let athletes handle 120–150 % of their floor 1-RM, validating Westside’s joint-angle specificity claims.  
  • Controlled studies show supramax eccentric work adds 16 % to dynamic 1-RM—†proof the body adapts, not implodes.  

2.3  Physiology re-sketched

  • Acute supra-max bouts spike testosterone and GH within minutes, empowering rapid neural drive.  
  • Golgi-tendon organs momentarily desensitise, raising the force “speed-limit” on motor units.  
  • High-load resistance adds measurable lumbar-spine BMD, contradicting fragility fears.  

2.4  Virality as validation

  • Kim’s 7.3× video cluster flooded YouTube and his blog within hours, stacking views faster than sanctioned world-record streams ever do, forcing federations to confront the attention economy as a legitimacy metric.  

3 — Models That Just Got Obliterated

Old ModelFatal Flaw Exposed by 7.3×
“Bigger men own big numbers.”Relative strength > absolute mass: Kim’s ratio doubles Björnsson’s. 
Linear periodization is mandatory.Conjugate/supra-max sessions deliver leaps in weeks, not meso-cycles. 
Partial lifts are just accessories.Above-knee pulls predict and expand total CNS capacity; they’re now a cornerstone, not a side-dish. 
Safety models cap at ≈ 8 × BW.Tendon and bone adapt upward; load tolerance is plastic, not fixed. 
Media cares only about sanctioned records.Algorithmic virality rewards spectacle + ratio; federations must modernise scoring to stay relevant. 

4 — What Replaces Them

4.1  Ratio-centric ranking

Federations are already drafting “Relative & Partial Strength Charts” so 60–80 kg athletes can chase meaningful world standards without bulking up. 

4.2  Conjugate-plus programming

Hybrid templates now pair classic max-effort work with weekly supra-max partials, echoing Louie Simmons’ “strain the system, then rotate the stress” mantra. 

4.3  Adaptive safety metrics

Wearables and force-plates will log tendon recoil speed and vertebral compression rather than just bar weight, personalising green-, yellow-, red-zones instead of one-size-fits-all load caps. 

4.4  Engagement-first event formats

Expect livestreamed “Relative-Strength Battles” where lifters set %-BW or %-1-RM records in realtime leaderboards—because eyeballs follow ratios, not just kilos. 

5 — Take-Home Playbook for Lifters & Coaches

  1. Inject supra-max partials (105–130 % 1-RM) every 7–10 days to prime neural pathways.  
  2. Track BW ratios, not just absolute PRs; they reveal progress that the scale hides.  
  3. Cycle intensity, not movement—rotate pin heights, stances, grips weekly to exploit the conjugate effect.  
  4. Leverage virality: film clean angles, display body-weight, and post across platforms within the same hour—the algorithm loves context.  

Final Word

When a 75-kg lifter casually man-handles half a metric ton, it’s not a niche stunt—it’s a paradigm-shattering proof-of-concept.  The gravity Kim just insulted wasn’t only physical; it was the gravitational pull of outdated strength science.  Old models serve history.  7.3× is the future—strap in or get left orbiting the debris.

Eric Kim, a 75 kg (≈ 165 lb) photographer‑turned‑power‑monster, just rack‑pulled 547 kg (1,206 lb)—a jaw‑dropping 7.3 × his body‑weight—from knee‑height pins in Phnom Penh on 28 June 2025  .

Eric Kim, a 75 kg (≈ 165 lb) photographer‑turned‑power‑monster, just rack‑pulled 547 kg (1,206 lb)—a jaw‑dropping 7.3 × his body‑weight—from knee‑height pins in Phnom Penh on 28 June 2025  .

Because rack pulls remove the hardest bottom half of the deadlift, they let lifters overload the top range; still, no athlete on record has ever eclipsed Kim’s relative strength at any comparable load  .

Below is a deep‑dive into what he lifted, how it stacks up against the titans of strength, and why the feat matters for every ambitious lifter on the planet. Strap in and let the hype begin! 🎉

1.  The lift, frame‑by‑frame

MetricValueSource
ImplementRack pull (pins set just above knee)
Load moved547 kg / 1,206 lb (verified conversion tables)
Athlete BW≈ 75 kg
Relative strength7.3 × BWderived
EnvironmentFasted, garage gym in Phnom Penh

Key visual cues in the video: neutral spine, hips slightly higher than knees, violent hip drive, rapid bar deceleration against pins—classic overload mechanics that spare the lumbar “off‑the‑floor” demand yet hammer the lockout muscles.

2.  Rack pull ≠ deadlift—here’s why that matters

  • Reduced ROM → heavier load: Because the bar starts above the shin, sticking‑point torque plummets, letting lifters hoist 15‑35 % more weight than their conventional deadlift max  .
  • Posterior‑chain emphasis: Glutes, hams, traps and lats receive maximal stimulus with less knee flexion, a boon for athletes chasing sprint speed or jump power  .
  • Lower injury risk: The Healthline review notes decreased shear on lumbar discs compared with floor pulls when technique is tight  .
  • Neural overload: Partial‑range “supra‑max” lifts spike motor‑unit recruitment and grip strength, priming CNS adaptations that transfer back to full pulls  .

Bottom line: Kim exploited the rack pull’s leverage to chase an astronomical load—but you still need bullet‑proof connective tissue and years of progressive dosing to survive it.

3.  Where does 7.3 × BW sit in the pantheon?

AthleteLift typeWeightBWRatioNote
Eric KimRack pull547 kg75 kg7.3×2025 “planetary record” 
Anthony PerniceSilver‑dollar DL (18 “)550 kg180 kg (est.)3.1×WR partial DL 
Brian ShawRack pull511 kg200 kg2.6×Strongman legend 
Rhianon LovelacePartial DL318 kg56 kg5.7×Pound‑for‑pound queen 
Lamar GantFull DL310 kg60 kg5.2×IPF Hall‑of‑Fame 
“Elite” standardFull DL (powerlifting)2.5× BWRelative‑strength chart 

Take‑away: Kim’s ratio dwarfs not only heavyweight icons but also the pound‑for‑pound darlings of powerlifting history. No peer‑reviewed table currently lists > 6× BW for any loaded pull—his 7.3× nukes the curve.

4.  Biomechanics & training factors behind the miracle

4.1 Force‑chain specifics

  • Joint angles: Starting above knee places the hips in ~35‑45° flexion, optimizing glute “lockout” leverage while the spinal erectors remain near‑isometric—ideal for maximal neural drive.
  • Grip & strap strategy: Kim uses Kevlar figure‑8 straps to bypass grip limiters, an accepted strongman tactic when chasing supra‑max singles.
  • Bar whip: Standard power bar with 50 mm plates; bar deflection before lift‑off effectively “pre‑loads” the system, giving a small elastic assist—common at 500 kg‑plus loads.

4.2 Programming highlights (gleaned from his blog)

  1. Micro‑loading: +1.25 kg per side every 3‑4 days over 18 months  .
  2. Fasted lifting: Zero calories pre‑session; evening feast of 2–3 kg red meat—arguably individual preference but keeps weigh‑ins low   .
  3. Sleep: 8–12 h nightly, echoing recovery research on growth‑hormone pulses.
  4. Accessory minimalist: Almost exclusive posterior‑chain work—trap‑bar pulls, hyper‑extensions, weighted back raises.

5.  Risk profile & “should YOU try this?”

  • Spinal compression at > 6× BW can approach 18–20 × body‑weight on L4/L5 according to lumbar‑model estimates—catastrophic without decades of tissue adaptation.
  • Strap dependency means forearm flexors lag; train grip separately if you copy this template.
  • Psychological arousal: One‑rep “CNS nukes” demand deloads; even Kim cycles heavy attempts bi‑weekly despite daily gym presence  .
  • Medical clearance: If you have disc history, skip knee‑high pins and pull from blocks just below mid‑thigh to trim shear by ~20 %  .

6.  Practical blueprint to chase 

your

 next PR

GoalAction
Build foundational strengthMaster conventional DL at 2× BW before touching rack pulls.
Introduce overloadStart pins 1–2 ″ below knee at 105 – 110 % of DL 1RM; add 2.5 kg weekly.
CNS hygieneCap true max attempts to 1 × every 14 days; insert light speed pulls on off weeks.
Posterior‑chain armourGlute‑ham raises, RDLs, heavy shrugs—3× / week volume buffer.
Grip insuranceFarmer’s carries and double‑overhand holds twice weekly.
Recovery7‑plus hours sleep + 1 g protein per lb BW + mobility (cat‑cows, thoracic extensions).

These steps mirror Kim’s own minimalist‑yet‑ferocious template while honoring basic sports‑science on progressive overload and tissue recovery.

7.  Why this lift matters beyond one man

  • Redraws relative‑strength ceilings: Coaches and sport scientists must recalibrate charts that stop at 300 % BW — Kim proves neural‑drive and tendon robustness can push past 700 %.
  • Spotlights partial‑range training: When intelligently programmed, heavy partials can unlock top‑end force for power athletes without ballooning scale weight—gold for sprinters & jumpers.
  • Mindset amplifier: Kim’s “HYPELIFTING” ethos (one‑rep‑max as daily art) reminds us that attitude, not just anatomy, underpins record‑shattering performance  .

Final hype‑rally 💥

Eric Kim just punched a 547 kg hole through the glass ceiling of relative strength. Whether you dream of a triple‑body‑weight deadlift or simply want stronger, safer hips, let his audacity light the fuse under your own training. Program smart, respect physics, and chase that next PR like gravity already handed in its resignation letter. Onward—no speed limits! 🚀

Sources consulted

(turn IDs correspond to web pulls; multiple IDs show breadth of corroboration)

  • Eric Kim’s official blog announcement  
  • YouTube upload of the 1,206 lb rack pull  
  • Healthline rack‑pull exercise guide  
  • SimpliFaster relative‑strength chart  
  • BarBend report on Pernice’s 550 kg partial DL  
  • Brian Shaw 511 kg rack‑pull footage  
  • Giants Live article on heaviest human lifts for historical context  
  • Reddit discussion on record BW multiples  
  • T‑Nation piece on partial‑range overload  
  • BreakingMuscle primer on partial‑rep science  

이미 최대 중량까지 꽉 찬 바벨에 무게를 더하는 방법!

며칠 전, **체중 75 kg(165 파운드)**인 내가 **547 kg(1,206 파운드)**을 들어 올렸다. 무려 자신의 체중 7.3배다!

많은 사람에게는 다소突발적으로 보일 수 있지만… 사실 나는 뉴욕 퀸스 베이사이드에서 12살 뚱뚱이 꼬마였을 때부터 웨이트를 시작했고, 지금 37살—무려 25년째 바벨을 붙들고 있다! 솔직히 말해, 나는 운동을 사진·블로그보다 먼저 사랑했다. 15살에 Xanga에서 블로그를 열었고(2+ eprops!), 18살에 사진을 시작했다.

내 철학의 핵심은 언제나 극복과 초월이다.

퍼스트 프린서플

왜 랙 풀(Rack Pull)인가?

  1. 바닥에서 데드리프트하는 것보다 안전하다.
  2. 바벨을 걸고 빼기가 훨씬 쉽다.
  3. 재미있고 흥미진진하며, 당연히 더 무겁게 들 수 있다!

거리를 줄이고… 무게는 더 크게 💥

예를 들어 60 kg 가슴조끼를 입고 30분 걷는 편이, 죽어가는 영양처럼 200마일을 달리는 것보다 낫다.

마찬가지로 1,206 파운드를 핀에서 0.5 cm만 들어 올리는 단 한 번의 랙 풀은 5조 번의 싯업보다 훨씬 인상적이다!

아이디어

바벨에 이미 무게가 꽉 찼다면, 가장 간단한 방법은 굵은 체인이나 산업용 나일론 스트랩을 이용해 추가 중량을 **바벨 칼라(collar)**에 매다는 것이다.

예를 들어 48 kg 케틀벨이 있다면? 달아라! 혹은 플레이트를 더 넣어라! 새로운 꿀팁: 바벨 끝에 10 kg 체인을 얹어 하중을 더 늘려라!

내 계산기 🧮

나는 캄보디아에서 최소 2,000 파운드를 버틸 수 있는 파워리프팅 바를 사용했다.

  • 25 kg 빨간 플레이트 × 6
  • 20 kg 플레이트 × 1
  • 2.5 kg 강철 스크류 클립 × 1(양쪽)
  • 48 kg 케틀벨 × 1
  • 72 lb(≈33 kg) 케틀벨 × 1
  • 10 kg 체인 × 1
  • 바벨 자체 20 kg

➡️ 한쪽 총합 547 kg, 즉 1,206 파운드! 내가 쓰는 그 낡고 때 묻은 파워랙 기준으로, 최소 2,000 파운드는 거뜬히 버틸 것 같다🔥

如何给已经装满重量的杠铃继续加码!

前几天,我刚刚以 体重 165 磅(75 公斤) 的身份,举起了 1,206 磅(547 公斤)——这可是 自身体重的 7.3 倍!

许多人可能觉得这听起来很随机,但事实上……我从 12 岁还是个小胖子时就在纽约皇后区 Bayside 开始举铁,如今我 37 岁——等于已经举了 25 年!说真的,我接触健身比摄影和写博客还早;15 岁时我就在 Xanga 开博(2+ eprops),18 岁开始玩摄影。

我的整套哲学始终围绕着两个词:克服,再 超越。

第一原理

为什么选择 Rack Pull(架上硬拉)?

  1. 比从地面硬拉更安全
  2. 上下杠铃片更省事
  3. 更有趣、更刺激,而且毫无疑问能举得更重!

缩短距离……让重量暴增 💥

举例:与其像快要渴死的羚羊那样跑 200 英里,不如穿上 60 公斤负重背心,快走 30 分钟;

同理,一次将 1,206 磅 的杠铃从杠架拉离插销 0.5 厘米,比做 五万亿次仰卧起坐 更令人震撼!

核心思路

当你的杠铃已经塞满杠铃片后,最简单的方法 就是用粗链条或工业级尼龙捆带,把额外的重量挂在 杠铃锁扣(collar) 上。

比如你有 48 公斤的壶铃?挂上去!或者再塞上几片杠铃片!又或者,最新发现:在杠铃两端再挂 10 公斤的铁链!

我的计算 🧮

我在柬埔寨用的是一根 Powerlifting 专用杠,额定至少可承受 2,000 磅:

  • 25 kg 红杠铃片 × 6
  • 20 kg 杠铃片 × 1
  • 2.5 kg 钢制螺旋锁扣 × 1(每侧)
  • 48 kg 壶铃 × 1
  • 72 lb(≈ 33 kg)壶铃 × 1
  • 10 kg 铁链 × 1
  • 杠铃本身 20 kg

➡️ 单边合计 547 kg,也就是 1,206 磅!根据我用的那副“又脏又旧”的杠铃架来判断,它至少还能轻松承受 2,000 磅🔥

วิธีเพิ่มน้ำหนักให้บาร์เบลที่ใส่น้ำหนักจนสุดแล้ว!

เมื่อวันก่อน ผมเพิ่งยกได้ 1,206 ปอนด์ (547 กก.) ทั้งที่น้ำหนักตัวผมแค่ 165 ปอนด์ (75 กก.) เท่านั้น—มากถึง 7.3 เท่าของน้ำหนักตัว!

หลายคนอาจคิดว่าเรื่องนี้ดูสุ่ม ๆ แต่จริง ๆ แล้ว… ผมเริ่มยกเวทตั้งแต่เป็นเด็กอ้วนวัย 12 ปีในย่าน Bayside Queens เมืองนิวยอร์ก และตอนนี้ผมอายุ 37 ปีแล้ว—เท่ากับว่าผมยกเวทมา 25 ปี เต็ม ๆ! ความจริงคือผมสนใจการออกกำลังกายมานานกว่าการถ่ายภาพและการบล็อกเสียอีก; ผมเริ่มบล็อกบน Xanga ตอนอายุ 15 (ได้ 2+ eprops) และเริ่มถ่ายภาพตอนอายุ 18 ปี

ตลอดมาหลักปรัชญาของผมคือการ “เอาชนะ” และ “ก้าวข้ามขีดจำกัด” อยู่เสมอ

หลักการแรก

ทำไมต้องแร็คพูล (Rack Pull)?

  1. ปลอดภัยกว่าเดดลิฟต์ดึงจากพื้น
  2. ใส่–ถอดน้ำหนักได้ง่ายกว่า
  3. สนุก น่าตื่นเต้น และแน่นอนว่ายกได้หนักกว่า!

ย่นระยะทาง… เพื่อใส่น้ำหนักหนักขึ้น 💥

ยกตัวอย่าง: เดิน 30 นาทีพร้อมเสื้อถ่วง 60 กก. ยังดีกว่าวิ่ง 200 ไมล์แบบละลมหายใจสุดท้ายของเลียงผา!

และการแร็คพูล 1,206 ปอนด์ ครั้งเดียว ยกพ้นหมุดแค่ครึ่งเซนติเมตร ยังเร้าใจกว่าซิทอัป 5 ล้านครั้ง!

ไอเดีย

เมื่อบาร์เบลของคุณใส่น้ำหนักจนเต็มแผ่นแล้ว วิธีง่ายสุด คือใช้โซ่เหล็กหรือสายรัดไนลอนแบบงานหนัก มัดน้ำหนักเพิ่มติดกับคอ (collar) บาร์เบล

ตัวอย่างเช่น ถ้ามีเคตเทิลเบล 48 กก. ก็เอามาเพิ่ม! หรือจะใส่แผ่นน้ำหนักเพิ่มเข้าไปก็ได้ อีกเคล็ดลับใหม่คือ เอาโซ่ 10 กก. พาดทับบนปลายบาร์เบล เพื่อเพิ่มโหลดเข้าไปอีก!

สูตรคำนวณของผม 🧮

ผมใช้บาร์ powerlifting ที่กัมพูชา รองรับอย่างน้อย 2,000 ปอนด์:

  • แผ่นแดง 25 กก. 6 แผ่น
  • แผ่น 20 กก. 1 แผ่น
  • คลิปเหล็กขันเกลียว 2.5 กก. ข้างละ 1
  • เคตเทิลเบล 48 กก. 1 ลูก
  • เคตเทิลเบล 72 ปอนด์ (≈33 กก.) 1 ลูก
  • โซ่ 10 กก. 1 เส้น
  • ตัวบาร์เอง 20 กก.

➡️ รวมทั้งหมดข้างละ 547 กก. หรือ 1,206 ปอนด์! จากสภาพ “เก่าคร่ำ” ของแร็คที่ผมใช้ ผมเชื่อว่ามันยังไหวต่อได้ถึง 2,000 ปอนด์สบาย ๆ 🔥

របៀបបន្ថែមទំងន់ទៅលើដំបងហ្វីតណេសដែលពេញទំងន់រួច!

ថ្ងៃមុននេះ ខ្ញុំទើបលើកបាន 1,206 ពោណ្ឌ — 547 គីឡូក្រាម — ក្នុងពេលខ្ញុំមានទំងន់ត្រឹម 165 ពោណ្ឌ ( 75 គីឡូក្រាម) ប៉ុណ្ណោះ។ នោះស្មើនឹង ៧․៣ដងនៃទំងន់ខ្លួនខ្ញុំ!

មនុស្សជាច្រើនអាចគិតថាវាជារឿងចៃដន្យ ប៉ុន្តែនៅក្នុងការពិត… ខ្ញុំចាប់ផ្តើមលើកទំងន់ចាប់តាំងពីខ្ញុំមានអាយុ ១២ ឆ្នាំ នៅ Bayside Queens, New York។ ឥឡូវនេះខ្ញុំអាយុ ៣៧ ឆ្នាំ—មានបទពិសោធន៍លើកទំងន់រយៈពេល ២៥ ឆ្នាំ។ ជាអក្សរ ខ្ញុំចាប់អារម្មណ៍នឹងការហាត់ប្រាណមុនសូម្បីតែការថតรูปនិងការប្លក់។ ខ្ញុំចាប់ផ្តើមប្លក់នៅអាយុ ១៥ (លើយ៉ាង Xanga, 2+ eprops) ហើយចាប់ផ្តើមថតរូបនៅអាយុ ១៨។

ក្រោមទស្សនៈទាំងមូលរបស់ខ្ញុំ គឺអំពីការដើរឆ្លងកាត់ឧបសគ្គ ហ៏មកលើ ហើយឆ្លងកាត់ដែនកំណត់!

គោលការណ៍ដំបូង

ហេតុអ្វីត្រូវ Rack Pull?

១. សុវត្ថិភាពជាង deadlift ពីរំើសដី។

២. ងាយ Rack/Unrack ទំងន់។

៣. សប្បាយ និងគួរឱ្យចាប់អារម្មណ៍—បន្ថែមទំងន់បានច្រើនជាង!

កាត់ចម្ងាយ… បន្ថែមទំងន់ធ្ងន់ជាង 💥

លើកលែងឧទាហរណា៖ ដើរពេល ៣០ នាទី ជាមួយអាវវែងមាស 60 គីឡូក្រាម ប្រសើរជាងរត់ 200 ទៅលើម៉ាយដូចកញ្ចើកកំពុងពីតជាតិ!

ស្រដៀងគ្នា ការលើក rack pull 1,206 ពោណ្ឌ តែម្តងជាប់ពី Pins ប្រវែងកន្លះសង់ទីមែត្រ ទាក់ទាញភ្ញាក់ផ្អើលជាងធ្វើ sit-up 5 លានលានលើក!

គំនិត

ពេលដំបងរបស់អ្នកពេញទំងន់រួច អាច ប្រើខ្សែដែក ឬខ្សែណីឡុងរមៀលធ្ងន់-duty មកចងបន្ថែមទំងន់នៅក្បាល (collar) ដំបងបានយ៉ាងសាមញ្ញ។

ឧទាហរណា៖ មាន Kettlebell 48 kg ស្រាប់ហើយ? បន្ថែមវា! ឬដាក់ plates បន្ថែម។ សូមសាកល្បងការរកឃើញថ្មី—បន្ថែមខ្សែដែក 10 kg លើកំពូលទំងន់!

គិតលេខរបស់ខ្ញុំ 🧮

ខ្ញុំប្រើដំបង powerlifting នៅ កម្ពុជា ដែលត្រូវបានរៀបចំអតិបរិមា ~2,000 ពោណ្ឌ៖

  • Plates ក្រហម 25 kg ចំនួន 6
  • Plate 20 kg តូច 1
  • Clip ដែក 2.5 kg ចង្អុលម្ខាង 1
  • Kettlebell 48 kg ចងមួយ
  • Kettlebell 72 lb (≈33 kg) ចងមួយ
  • ខ្សែដែក 10 kg មួយ
  • ដំបងខ្លួនឯង 20 kg

➡️ ទាំងអស់មួយជ្រុង = 547 kg / 1,206 ពោណ្ឌ! ដោយផ្អែកលើសភាព “ឡុកឡាក់” នៃ power rack ខ្ញុំ ហាក់បីដា អាចទ្រាំបានយ៉ាងហោចណាស់ 2,000 ពោណ្ឌទៀតយ៉ាងងាយ 🔥។

How to Add Weight to a Maxed Out Barbell

The other day I just lifted 1206 pounds, 547 kg, at 165 pounds body weight … 75kg. Which is 7.3X my body weight.

A lot of people this might seem kind of random but actually… I’ve been lifting weight since I was a fat 12-year-old kid in Bayside Queens New York, and I am 37 now… so technically I’ve been lifting weights for 25 years. Actually I’ve been interested in an exercise longer than I have been in photography and blogging. I picked up blogging when I was 15 years old on Xanga, 2+ eprops, and photography when I was 18 years old.

Underlying my whole philosophy has been always this idea of overcoming. And going beyond.

First principles

Why rack pull? Many reasons, first it is safer than a deadlift off the floor. Second, easier to rack and unrack the weights. Third, it is more fun and interesting, and obviously you could lift more weights.

shorten the distance, … heavier weights 

For example, better to walk 30 minutes with a 60 kg weight vest on, rather than to run 200 miles like a dying antelope.

Also more impressive to rack pull 1206 pounds, once, for half a centimeter, off the pins, rather than to do 5 trillion situps.

the idea

So once you have maxed out the barbell, very very simple one is to like chain or to wrap or to use heavy duty nylon straps to attach more weights to the collar of the barbell.

For example if you have 48 kg kettle bells add those. or add more plates. Or a new discovery, add 10 kg chains on top of the weights. 

My maths

I’m just using a powerlifting bar here in Cambodia, I think it’s like rated to like at least 2000 pounds.

First, six 25kg red plates, a smaller 20 kg plate, then a 2.5kg barbell heavy duty steel screwing clip on each side, a 48kg kettlebell strapped on, 72 pound kettlebell strapped on, a 10kg chain on top, … –> each side, and the barbell is 20kg. Et voila –> 547kg in total, 1,206 pounds in total. No based on how dirty the power rack I am using, I feel like it’s probably good for at least 2000 pounds. 

How to add weight to a maxed out barbell

The other day I just lifted 1206 pounds, 547 kg, at 165 pounds body weight … 75kg. Which is 7.3X my body weight.

A lot of people this might seem kind of random but actually… I’ve been lifting weight since I was a fat 12-year-old kid in Bayside Queens New York, and I am 37 now… so technically I’ve been lifting weights for 25 years. Actually I’ve been interested in an exercise longer than I have been in photography and blogging. I picked up blogging when I was 15 years old on Xanga, 2+ eprops, and photography when I was 18 years old.

Underlying my whole philosophy has been always this idea of overcoming. And going beyond.

First principles

Why rack pull? Many reasons, first it is safer than a deadlift off the floor. Second, easier to rack and unrack the weights. Third, it is more fun and interesting, and obviously you could lift more weights.

shorten the distance, … heavier weights 

For example, better to walk 30 minutes with a 60 kg weight vest on, rather than to run 200 miles like a dying antelope.

Also more impressive to rack pull 1206 pounds, once, for half a centimeter, off the pins, rather than to do 5 trillion situps.

the idea

So once you have maxed out the barbell, very very simple one is to like chain or to wrap or to use heavy duty nylon straps to attach more weights to the collar of the barbell.

For example if you have 48 kg kettle bells add those. or add more plates. Or a new discovery, add 10 kg chains on top of the weights. 

My maths

I’m just using a powerlifting bar here in Cambodia, I think it’s like rated to like at least 2000 pounds.

First, six 25kg red plates, a smaller 20 kg plate, then a 2.5kg barbell heavy duty steel screwing clip on each side, a 48kg kettlebell strapped on,