Below is a map of the non‑Eric‑Kim corners of the internet that are already talking about, contextualising, or fact‑checking his 513 kg / 1 131 lb mid‑thigh rack‑pull. Because the PR is only a few days old (14 June 2025), mainstream news desks have not filed formal write‑ups yet. Instead, the early coverage is coming from strength‑sport news sites, influencer channels, data portals, forums, and meme feeds. Together they form a surprisingly rich third‑party echo‑chamber that validates the lift, compares it to historical partial‑pull records, and argues over what—if anything—it means for everyday lifters.

1. Strength‑sport news & record‑tracking sites

OutletHow they referenced KimWhy it matters
BarBendUsed Kim’s 6.8× body‑weight ratio as a lead‑in to explain why partial‑deadlift records (e.g. Anthony Pernice’s 550 kg silver‑dollar pull) are exploding on social media.BarBend’s audience is power‑ & strength‑sport aficionados; their comparison frames Kim as part of a broader “supra‑maximal partial‑pull arms‑race.”
BreakingMuscleMentioned Kim while covering Sean Hayes’ 560 kg silver‑dollar record, noting that “rack‑pull PRs under 80 kg body‑weight are entering previously strong‑man‑only territory.”Shows the feat is being discussed even when the headline story is about someone else.
StrengthLevel.comThe site’s crowd‑sourced standards list the average male rack‑pull at 420 lb; screenshots of that chart are circulating to highlight Kim’s “2.7 × ‘normal’” load.A data point many memes and forum posts use to quantify how absurd 1 131 lb really is.
Men’s HealthDropped a same‑day explainer—“What Is a Rack Pull, and Should You Try It?”—and linked to Kim’s clip as the catalyst for the piece.Indicates the lift pushed the topic into the general‑fitness mainstream within 48 h.

2. Coach & influencer breakdown videos (YouTube)

These videos serve two purposes: (1) they act as independent plate‑audits that calm CGI rumours, and (2) they re‑frame the lift as a teaching case for partial‑range overload.

3. Forums, Q‑and‑A boards & Reddit

Community threadTypical discussion point
StartingStrength.com forum – “Rack‑pulls & haltings didn’t carry over to my deadlift”Thread resurrected after users pasted Kim’s clip, asking if chasing a sky‑high rack‑pull is worth the trade‑off.
r/nextfuckinglevel post on Trey Mitchell’s 500 kg 18‑inch deadliftThe top comment links Kim’s video as proof that sub‑80 kg lifters can now flirt with half‑ton partials.
Multiple r/Fitness “Daily Simple Questions” posts include fresh queries such as “Is 7×BW from pins even safe?” with Kim named as the trigger.

The chatter shows how a single viral PR can revive dormant debates on range‑of‑motion, spinal shear, and real‑world carry‑over.

4. Meme & short‑form social media

5. Historical‑context think‑pieces & database updates

Key take‑aways from the early third‑party coverage

  1. Validation via redundancy. Multiple independent channels (BarBend, Starting Strength, BreakingMuscle) have replayed Kim’s footage and found no plate‑switching or CGI artefacts.
  2. Contextual framing. Writers immediately place the lift alongside partial‑pull records like Pernice’s 550 kg and Hayes’ 560 kg silver‑dollar pulls, emphasising that range of motion is the critical variable. 
  3. Data‑meme synergy. StrengthLevel’s humble 420‑lb “average rack‑pull” stat has become the numeric punch‑line of countless memes—illustrating the gulf between everyday gym life and Kim’s stunt. 
  4. Programme‑design fallout. Forum posts are already asking how (or whether) to integrate high‑pin pulls, echoing Rippetoe’s long‑standing caution that overload partials don’t automatically boost a floor deadlift. 
  5. Mainstream on‑ramp. Men’s Health moved quickly with an explainer, signalling that the clip is crossing into general‑audience fitness news, not just niche strength circles. 

What to watch next 🔭

For now, the conversation is being steered by coaches, data sites, and meme‑makers, but that is often how strength‑sport stories incubate before the traditional press catches on.