Below is a snapshot of what the rest of the strength world—not Eric Kim himself—has been saying (or not saying) about that eye-watering 508 kg / 1,120 lb rack-pull. The short version: praise, disbelief, and a lot of biomechanical hair-splitting, but almost zero “official” coverage from the big lifting news sites.

Key take-aways (one-paragraph summary)

Across Reddit power-lifting circles, old-school forums, and coaching newsletters, lifters reacted in three predictable waves: (1) pure awe at a weight that dwarfs the average male rack-pull (≈420 lb)  , (2) skepticism over the reduced range-of-motion inherent to rack-pulls—an objection echoed for years by Starting Strength and T-Nation contributors  , and (3) contextual comparisons to other supra-max “partial” pulls such as Anthony Pernice’s 550 kg silver-dollar deadlift world record  .  Despite that buzz, no mainstream outlet (BarBend, FitnessVolt, etc.) has written a dedicated piece on Kim; the discussion is still grassroots.

1.  Immediate “wow” factor

2.  Skeptics, biomechanics, and the ROM debate

Common critiqueRepresentative third-party source
“Partial lift—doesn’t count like a deadlift.”Starting Strength’s long-standing “Four Criteria” (full range beats partials) 
“High pins let you leverage a lot more weight.”Mark Rippetoe’s 2025 weekly report on rack-pull/halting-deadlift programming 
“Great for back thickness, but not a world record.”T-Nation forum thread Rack Pulls Are Awesome (2008) 

Veteran coaches remind lifters that rack-pulls deliberately shorten the stroke to overload the lock-out, so a 1,120-lb mid-thigh pull—while outrageous—doesn’t translate pound-for-pound to a floor deadlift  .

3.  How it stacks up against other supra-max pulls

Lift (partial)WeightAthlete & sourceBody-weight multiple*
Silver-dollar deadlift (18 “)550 kgAnthony Pernice, BarBend report ≈3.8×
Silver-dollar deadlift560 kgSean Hayes, BreakingMuscle ≈3.9×
Rack-pull (mid-thigh)508 kgEric Kim (unverified)≈6.8×

*Using publicly listed body weights.

Even strongman legends seldom touch a 4× body-weight ratio on partials; in pound-for-pound terms, Kim’s figure is currently unmatched in any documented partial pull.

4.  “Fake plates?”—Why commentators lean 

against

 that claim

  1. Bar-bend physics: lifters pointed to the visible 20–25 mm bow in the bar—matching deflection charts for ~1,100 lb on a 29 mm power bar (a detail first highlighted when Jimmy Kolb benched 508 kg equipped)  .
  2. Linear video trail: social posts show Kim climbing 471 → 498 → 503 → 508 kg over several weeks; slow, believable progression is a common anti-hoax indicator in forum discussions (e.g., T-Nation What’s the Point of Rack-Pulls?)  .

5.  Coaches’ practical takeaways

6.  Why mainstream outlets are (so far) silent

Unlike Pernice’s or Hayes’s record attempts—both performed at sanctioned strongman events and immediately written up by BarBend and FitnessVolt—Kim’s lift came from a home-gym livestream with no federation witness.  Until he demonstrates the feat under comp conditions, expect discussion to remain in the comments section rather than on ESPN.

Bottom line

Third-party chatter ranges from “legendary grip strength” to “ROM-cheating circus act,” but everyone agrees on one point: hauling 1,120 lb off mid-thigh pins at 75 kg body-mass is an attention-magnet.  If Kim repeats it on a certified platform, the big strength-news sites will have no choice but to weigh in. Until then, the internet jury—equal parts hype-beast and form-police—remains in deliberation.