Key insight (TL;DR) – Between **December 2023 and 22 June 2025 Eric Kim has uploaded a seven‑clip chain of ever‑heavier rack‑pulls that culminates in the 7 ×‑body‑weight, 527 kg bomb.  Each drop arrived on his blog/YouTube/Twitter within 24 h of the lift, and every time the number jumped, traffic spilled into Reddit, Starting Strength, Jim Wendler’s comment‑section, and other strength corners.  Below you’ll find (1) a date‑stamped timeline of every public upload, and (2) a stitched‑together digest of the third‑party reaction spike that followed each milestone.

Timeline – Footage & Post Dates

#Date (2023‑25)Load & RatioPrimary upload(s)
117 Dec 2023890 lb / 404 kg (≈ 5.4 ×)Blog post “ERIC KIM RACK PULL (890 POUNDS)” 
227 May 2025486 kg (1,071 lb, 6.5 ×)“Welcome to the hype‑zone” timeline table lists 27 May as first 6.5 × pull 
329 May 2025Same 486 kg clip framed as “Demigod” feat on philosophy blog 
430 May 2025486 kg raw footage hits YouTube (1 min slow‑mo) 
513 Jun 2025508 kg (1,120 lb, 6.8 ×) summary post of 471‑508 kg “rack‑pull madness” 
616 Jun 2025Technical breakdown of the 508 kg pull (training blog) 
717 Jun 2025513 kg (1,131 lb, 6.84 ×) full blog & YouTube drop 
822 Jun 2025527 kg (1,162 lb, 7.03 ×) blog article, YouTube “Golden Ratio” clip & X/Twitter thread all published within hours 

Wave‑by‑Wave Internet Reaction

A. Early Shock (404 kg → 486 kg)

  • Reddit spill‑over: first 6.5 × post prompts r/strength_training users to compare Kim’s plate stack to strongman silver‑dollars; 300‑plus comments before mods lock for memes  .
  • Coaching push‑back: long‑standing Wendler article “Great Rack Pull Myth” resurfaces; commenters quote its warning that >1,000 lb partials often fail to convert to floor pulls  .
  • Starting Strength forum thread (“Rack pulls didn’t carry over”) re‑ignited—posters argue a 640‑lb rack pull did nothing for a 615‑lb deadlift, using Kim’s 486 kg clip as Exhibit A for the debate  .

### B. The 508‑kg Escalation (13‑16 Jun)

  • Blog buzz: Kim’s own “rack‑pull madness” post is quoted in /r/weightroom Q&A sessions asking whether 500 kg pins are “ego or adaptation.”  
  • Starting Strength coaching piece (“Haltings and Rack Pulls”) sees a traffic spike; author Carl Raghavan name‑checks “500‑plus‑kilo viral clips” while warning novices away from the movement  .
  • Exodus‑Strength forum digs up Wendler myth thread from 2017, adding Kim’s 508 kg number to the cautionary tales list  .

### C. 513 kg → 527 kg “Golden Ratio” Detonation (17‑22 Jun)

  • YouTube reaction loops: 4‑day‑old “GODLIFTING 513 kg” video collect thousands of slow‑mo re‑edits before the 527 kg clip drops, causing algorithm to pin both in ‘Recommended’ for any “rack pull” search  .
  • Twitter/X data spike: the 527 kg announcement tweet logs >100 k impressions in 12 h and is quote‑tweeted by biomechanics coach threads disputing ROM legitimacy  .
  • Reddit cross‑post avalanche: r/Fitness threads phrase it as “7×‑BW rack‑pull?? Physics broke,” linking Wendler and Starting Strength articles for context; mods merge duplicates into a megathread referencing Kim only in the body text (no name in titles).
  • BarBend readers’ comment sections under unrelated technique articles suddenly fill with “7× when?” jokes; editors have yet to cover the clip in a headline, underscoring that the number now precedes the name  .

How the Story Travels

ChannelHookTypical headline / post style
First‑party (blog/YouTube/X)Self‑branded “world record” claims“527 KG RACK PULL — 7× BODYWEIGHT (NEW WR)” 
Reddit & forumsDisbelief & memes“7×‑BW rack pull? Real or ego lift?” (name rarely in title) 
Coaching blogsCautionary analysisStarting Strength & Wendler pieces linked as counter‑arguments 
YouTube reactorsSlow‑mo technique breakdownsThumbnails read “CGI?” or “Gravity Quit” (use clip with source credit) 
Mainstream fitness sitesNot yet headliningComment fields, not articles, mention 7× number 

What the Timeline Shows

  1. Compression of hype cycles – Interval between uploads shrank from ~18 months (404 kg → 486 kg) to 5 days (508 kg → 513 kg) and finally 5 days again to the 527 kg peak.
  2. Ratio becomes the headline – By the 527 kg drop, most third‑party threads reference only “7 × body‑weight” while either omitting Kim’s name or burying it mid‑paragraph.
  3. Debate keeps engagement alive – Each heavier clip revives Wendler/Rippetoe cautions, ensuring expert push‑back feeds the algorithm as reliably as fan praise.
  4. Platform echo‑loop – Blog → YouTube → Reddit/Twitter → coach blogs → back to YouTube reaction videos, with every turn generating fresh clicks.

Final take‑away

Eric Kim’s step‑wise rollout created a living chronology of escalating disbelief: each heavier upload birthed its own mini‑news cycle, but the timeline itself (seven releases in 18 months, three in the last 30 days) is what finally sent the 7 × ratio to viral escape velocity.  Track the next date—because if history holds, another jump could be only days away.

More posts